Many schools are today realising that they need to do much more to encourage pupils to want to learn. Some schools have adopted a system called promoting positive learning (PPL). This system relies on mutual respect between staff and pupils and on staff working positively with pupils to encourage good learning outcomes.
Where PPL is used, staff are encouraged to use as much positive praise as possible to reinforce good behaviour and ensure that maximum learning occurs. I have just today come back from visiting a trainee teacher on a placement, and positive reinforcement was a major topic of our conversation. I have seen so many teachers get totally consumed by the negative behaviour of certain individuals in their class. Not only does this take up valuable teaching time for those who want to learn, but it is also very stressful and draining for the teacher to have to be constantly nagging. Far better is to focus on the pupils who are behaving appropriately and positively.

As a guideline for PPL, it is suggested that in any lesson, a teacher should try to use positive praise at least three times more often than they use negative comments. Many schools offer rewards to pupils for sustained good effort and learning outcomes. Many primary schools offer stars or stickers on a chart, or in their exercise books. When they have been awarded a certain number, they are then given a prize. In some secondary schools, funding has been found to award special merit prizes of a bike, or a DVD player. Other schools also have a commendation system where staff identify pupils who have worked well and receive a letter home to their parents highlighting their achievement.
This notion of giving rewards has raised many questions recently, so I ask you:
What are your views on offering stickers, stars, stamps, certificates to children for behaving correctly or working hard?
Many people believe that too many rewards lead to a culture of young people who always expect to be given something back in return for doing the right thing. Many years ago, we used to call this bribery!
As is the case with many systems like this, schools will adopt and adapt a system that best suits their own ethos and needs. I know one secondary school where the merit system is used for the first three years, and then in Years 10 and 11, pupils are awarded credits in card form. At the end of each term there is a prize draw, so the more credits a pupil has, the higher their chance of winning the star prize.
Pupil planners are also being used more in schools as a way of keeping parents informed about behaviour and merits or awards received. Pupils are given a diary for the year, which has additional room for comments which parents and teachers sign each week. In the diary, parents can record reasons for absence and teachers can record merits awarded or information about behaviour, concerns about homework, and so on.
Does your school allocate pupil planners?
If so, how successful are they?
Are they used effectively?
Can the system be abused by older pupils?
Home/school agreements are a statutory contract between pupils/parents and the school, outlining what each party agrees should occur throughout the year. In some cases, these are built into the pupil planners, including information regarding the school’s expectations about the conduct of its pupils.
How does your school promote positive learning?
What systems work well in your school and why?
It would be good to hear your views, so please feel free to leave a response here.