<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Plain Sailing In Schools &#187; primary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://plainsailinginschools.com/tag/primary/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://plainsailinginschools.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 19:36:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Is The Primary Curriculum In England Too Narrow?</title>
		<link>http://plainsailinginschools.com/education-news/is-the-primary-curriculum-in-england-too-narrow</link>
		<comments>http://plainsailinginschools.com/education-news/is-the-primary-curriculum-in-england-too-narrow#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 08:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian Barrett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Curriculum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[primary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://plainsailinginschools.com/v1/?p=58</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There has been a lot in the news recently about how narrow the primary curriculum is in England, especially with the emphasis in recent years on teaching the basics in literacy and numeracy. There are now plans for a major shakeup of the curriculum.
The author of a recent Cambridge University report warns that too much [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There has been a lot in the news recently about how narrow the primary curriculum is in England, especially with the emphasis in recent years on teaching the basics in literacy and numeracy. There are now plans for a major shakeup of the curriculum.</p>
<p>The author of a recent Cambridge University report warns that too much emphasis on testing the basics could &#8220;impoverish&#8221; learning in areas such as the arts. Professor Robin Alexander says this could mean a &#8220;deficient&#8221; education.</p>
<p>The report says inadequacies in the primary curriculum stem from a mistaken belief that breadth in the curriculum is incompatible with improved standards in the &#8220;basics&#8221; of maths, literacy and numeracy. History, geography, science and the arts have been &#8220;squeezed out&#8221;, it argues. The report&#8217;s authors suggest learning in primary schools is skewed towards subjects which are formally tested in the national tests, used to draw up league tables.</p>
<p><img class="alignright" title="boy-in-school" src="http://plainsailinginschools.com/v1/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/boy-in-school.png" alt="boy-in-school" width="162" height="166" /></p>
<p>The review suggests the primary curriculum should be &#8220;re-conceived&#8221; with 12 specific aims, which it arranges in three groups:</p>
<ul>
<li>The needs and capacities of the individual: wellbeing; engagement; empowerment; autonomy</li>
<li>The individual in relation to others and the wider world: encouraging respect and reciprocity; promoting interdependence and sustainability; empowering local, national and global citizenship; celebrating culture and community</li>
<li>Learning, knowing and doing: knowing, understanding, exploring and making sense; fostering skill; exciting the imagination; enacting dialogue.</li>
</ul>
<p>These aims would be achieved through eight &#8220;domains&#8221;, rather than a small number of subjects. The domains would be: arts and creativity; citizenship and ethics; faith and belief; language, oracy and literacy; mathematics; physical and emotional health; place and time (geography and history); science and technology.</p>
<p>This seems to me to be quite similar to the framework for the Early Years Foundation Stage, along with its&#8217; six areas of learning &#8211; the Early Learning Goals. I have always found this to be a very effective model for curriculum planning, and lends itself to a more thematic or &#8216;topic&#8217; approach, which is how things were done in the late 1980s and early 1990s. It seems fundamental to me that children do not view their learning, or the world, in terms of separate compartmentalised units. In contrast, they need to see that everything is interrelated.</p>
<p>What are you views on this? What impact will it have on teachers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://plainsailinginschools.com/education-news/is-the-primary-curriculum-in-england-too-narrow/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
